Subject: Re: libftdi-1.0 release
>>>>> "Xiaofan" == Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Xiaofan> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Thomas Jarosch
Xiaofan> <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Xiaofan,
>> On 07/26/2011 02:59 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>>> Maybe we can use this thread as a start.
>>> Tasks to make libftdi-1.0 compatible with libftdi-0.19 without API
>>> breakage. Uwe mentioned the following two points. 1) To make EEPROM
>>> structure opaque 2) To deal with ftdi_context
>> Do you remember what you meant by "To deal with ftdi_context"?
>> Does that read: "Make ftdi_context structure opaque"?
We should at least identify the functions that access the ftdi context
direct. Then perhaps some thought need to be made if all these functions are
We(I) could then try to do something similar like for EEPROM settings. Then
we could perhaps mark the opld functions obsolet. I propose to do that
before the 1.0 release.
Uwe Bonnes bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx