>>>>> "Xiaofan" == Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Xiaofan> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Thomas Jarosch
Xiaofan> <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Xiaofan,
>>
>> On 07/26/2011 02:59 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>>> Maybe we can use this thread as a start.
>>>
>>> Tasks to make libftdi-1.0 compatible with libftdi-0.19 without API
>>> breakage. Uwe mentioned the following two points. 1) To make EEPROM
>>> structure opaque 2) To deal with ftdi_context
>> Do you remember what you meant by "To deal with ftdi_context"?
>>
>> Does that read: "Make ftdi_context structure opaque"?
>>
Xiaofan> Yes.
We should at least identify the functions that access the ftdi context
direct. Then perhaps some thought need to be made if all these functions are
really usefull/nescessary.
We(I) could then try to do something similar like for EEPROM settings. Then
we could perhaps mark the opld functions obsolet. I propose to do that
before the 1.0 release.
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
