Uwe,
On Friday, 30. September 2011 12:45:14 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Xiaofan> Yes.
>
>
> We should at least identify the functions that access the ftdi context
> direct. Then perhaps some thought need to be made if all these functions
> are really usefull/nescessary.
>
> We(I) could then try to do something similar like for EEPROM settings.
> Then we could perhaps mark the opld functions obsolet. I propose to do
> that before the 1.0 release.
If it doesn't take you too much time, then go ahead.
Remember: The original goal of libftdi 1.x was to port it
to libusb 1.x. That goal is already reached. Still it's
a good opportunity to improve the API.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
