On Friday, September 03, 2010 11:00:12 Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> On Thursday, 2. September 2010 19:10:11 you wrote:
> > > I'm sure Gentoo provides cmake, right?
> >
> > i understand your desire to not have to maintain autoconf. but i
> > certainly can take care of that aspect and just send patches when
> > necessary. you could even have a dummy configure/Makefile that output
> > "use cmake now" and for people who want autotools, they'll get
> > overwritten when generating things.
>
> What about the other way round? Some people add new features
> to libftdi and only provide autoconf support.
tell them "sorry, post a patch for cmake"
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
|
