On Thursday, September 02, 2010 02:06:07 Michael Plante wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> why is having libftdi-1.x require
> >> libusb-1.x isnt a big deal for distros ? we have those packages in
> >> Gentoo right now.
>
> Well, it's good to see your request was finally granted this past month:
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304149
>
> Could you elaborate on why a slot won't work for libftdi-1 too?
i never said it isnt possible. i did say it's more work and i'm questioning
whether it's necessary for libftdi to put this work on all distros.
i havent seen points yet that indicate replacing libftdi-0.x with libftdi-1.x
require changing the API/ABI in a backwards-incompatible way. do you have
examples for me ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
| 