Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> Wouldn't be the 1.0 release be a good point where we should make
ftdi_context
>> opaque to the users, disallow all direct access and force the user to do
>> ftdi_new() ?
Maybe, but there were some members that do not currently have functions
available to modify them. At least in 0.1. Such as usb_read_timeout and
usb_write_timeout. If you make it opaque, be prepared to add
accessors/modifiers (or whatever jargon is used in C).
Michael
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
