On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> is there a list of pending issues holding up adding libusb-1.0 support to the
> master libftdi tree ? if there's a TODO or something that i can help tackle,
> that would work. having one released version to deal with would make my life
> a lot easier as ive finished porting urjtag to libusb-1.0 already.
>
> (please cc me as i dont receive posts to this list)
Please refer to the following post from Thomas.
http://developer.intra2net.com/mailarchive/html/libftdi/2010/msg00364.html
Todo:
1. Rename the library and header file. (not yet)
2. Remove autoconf support (resolved).
And this one:
http://developer.intra2net.com/mailarchive/html/libftdi/2010/msg00257.html
So I will think it is not really a merge, but rather to make the two
libraries can
co-exist (like libusb and libusb-1.0). But I understand this may cause some
extra work for project like urjtag.
--
Xiaofan
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|