libftdi Archives

Subject: Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline

From: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:38:39 +0800
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> is there a list of pending issues holding up adding libusb-1.0 support to the
> master libftdi tree ?  if there's a TODO or something that i can help tackle,
> that would work.  having one released version to deal with would make my life
> a lot easier as ive finished porting urjtag to libusb-1.0 already.
> (please cc me as i dont receive posts to this list)

Please refer to the following post from Thomas.

1. Rename the library and header file. (not yet)
2. Remove autoconf support (resolved).

And this one:

So I will think it is not really a merge, but rather to make the two
libraries can
co-exist (like libusb and libusb-1.0). But I understand this may cause some
extra work for project like urjtag.


libftdi - see for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Current Thread