libftdi Archives
|
From: | Florian Preinstorfer <fp@xxxxxxx> |
---|---|
To: | <libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:42:31 +0200 |
> you are right, eeprom->rs232_inversion is the same as eeprom->invert. > To replacing it is good. However i propose to split up yout patch in two > parts: > - first replacing rs232_inversio vs. invert. > - second introducing the printout function. > > This will help regression testing. Hi Uwe. Good point, thanks for reviewing the patch. Please find two patches attached, that split up the rs232_inversion replacement and the printout function. best regards, Florian
0001-Replace-eeprom-rs232_inversion-with-eeprom-invert.patch
0002-Add-print_inverted_bits-to-replace-a-duplicated-code.patch
signature.asc |
Current Thread |
---|
|