Re: [PATCH] Replace eeprom->rs232_inversion with eeprom->invert.

[Florian Preinstorfer <fp@xxxxxxx>]

On 22/10/14 10:51, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
> Doesn't that mean that an interface users are using changed?
I don't think so. The rs232_inversion options were never (to my
knowledge and based on a few simple tests) processed by ftdi_eeprom.
Both, invert and rs232_inversion, seem to write to the same memory
location, so I thought merging them together might be a suitable option.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature