On Monday, 5. September 2011 20:02:53 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> All H type behave the same until now. So no need to duplicate the
> expected results, as this may introduce errors. The test should loop
> through the same challanges with the different types.
Done
> Also my code uses the 120 MHz clock, as soon as possible (458 Baud).
> This results in a more exact baudrate. This is different form the old
> behaviour, that didn't know about the 120 MHz clock in the H parts.
Yeah, it's funny how the 57600 baudrate jumps to 120 Mhz
and all the others use the 48 Mhz clock again.
> I will read the datasheets again about AM, BM and R. I suspect, BM and R
> also behave the same, but will explicit report later. AM probably has no
> documentation, I have also no physical sample, so things are vague.
I don't have an AM sample either.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
