$^¶
------Original Message------
From: Thomas Jarosch
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ReplyTo: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: libftdi-1.0: More patches
Sent: Sep 5, 2011 10:52 AM
Hi Uwe,
On Monday, 5. September 2011 18:07:20 Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> > Perhaps the unit test should look at devisor, fractional bit and clock
> > pre-divider separate.
> > Divisor = value & 0x3ff
> > Encoded Fractional bits = (index & 0x100)?4:0 + value >>12
> > clk = (index & 0x100)? 120 MHz: 48 MHz
Done. The output didn't really change for the AM, BM, R and 2232C
type chips, so I'm certainly happy with that.
Could you take a look at the expected data for the x232H type chips?
If it looks reasonable to you, I'll commit the branch to "master".
You can also throw in some more test for higher baudrates if you want.
The idea is to catch unwanted changes if f.e. we touch the baudrate code
again in some months when a new/faster chip type gets released.
Have a nice evening,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
