libftdi Archives

Subject: RE: Should ftdi_read_data_submit_to() be a new call?

From: "Michael Plante" <michael.plante@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:38:03 -0400
>> Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>     Thomas> On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 14:06:33 Michael Plante wrote:
>>     >> Thomas Jarosch wrote: >> On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 04:40:33
>>     >> Michael Plante wrote: >> > Dunno what to say about libftdi-1.0,
but
>>     >> my concern was with >> > libftdi-0.1/git, which still doesn't seem
to
>>     >> have 3b92d47 reverted.
>>     >> >>
>>     >> >> As far as I can see from the archive, the discussion was still
>>     >> going >> on?
>>     >>
>>     >> I thought Uwe had agreed, but we can wait and see what advice he
has.
>>
>>     Thomas> Uwe, any comment on this one?
>>
>> Thanks for the remainder. But how to I identify "3b92d47".
>> "git log" on my tree doesn't contain that number, "git pull" tells me
that I
>> am up to date


You're probably looking at libftdi-1.0 instead of libftdi-0.1:

http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=libftdi;a=commit;h=3b92d479565a413c7b9
f830c34c93886ba366347

Regards,
Michael


--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   

Current Thread