On Friday, 1. April 2011 15:43:57 Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I just feel that the function name ftdi_read_data_submit_to()
> sounds a bit strange. Maybe ftdi_read_data_submit_with_timeout()
> is better.
>
> On the other hand, probably changing arguments of ftdi_read_data_submit()
> to include the timeout is better.
+1 to include the timeout in the original function
as libftdi-1.0 is still unreleased / "unstable".
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|