libftdi Archives

Subject: Re: Should ftdi_read_data_submit_to() be a new call?

From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:00:21 +0200
On Friday, 1. April 2011 15:43:57 Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I just feel that the function name ftdi_read_data_submit_to()
> sounds a bit strange. Maybe  ftdi_read_data_submit_with_timeout()
> is better.
> 
> On the other hand, probably changing arguments of ftdi_read_data_submit()
> to include the timeout is better.

+1 to include the timeout in the original function
as libftdi-1.0 is still unreleased / "unstable".

Thomas

--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   

Current Thread