libftdi Archives
<prev [Date Index] next>
<prev [Thread Index] next>

Subject: Re: Should ftdi_read_data_submit_to() be a new call?

From: Uwe Bonnes <bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Uwe Bonnes <bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:58:26 +0200 
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Thomas> On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 14:06:33 Michael Plante wrote:
    >> Thomas Jarosch wrote: >> On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 04:40:33
    >> Michael Plante wrote: >> > Dunno what to say about libftdi-1.0, but
    >> my concern was with >> > libftdi-0.1/git, which still doesn't seem to
    >> have 3b92d47 reverted.
    >> >> 
    >> >> As far as I can see from the archive, the discussion was still
    >> going >> on?
    >> 
    >> I thought Uwe had agreed, but we can wait and see what advice he has.

    Thomas> Uwe, any comment on this one?

Thanks for the remainder. But how to I identify "3b92d47".
"git log" on my tree doesn't contain that number, "git pull" tells me that I
am up to date

Thanks

-- 
Uwe Bonnes                bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread