Thomas Jarosch wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 04:40:33 Michael Plante wrote:
>> > Dunno what to say about libftdi-1.0, but my concern was with
>> > libftdi-0.1/git, which still doesn't seem to have 3b92d47 reverted.
>>
>> As far as I can see from the archive, the discussion was still going on?
I thought Uwe had agreed, but we can wait and see what advice he has.
>> Is that thing easily revertible with git or do I need to do it manually?
Hrm. I assume the intent is to actually commit a revert (the alternative of
rebasing the mainline seems unnecessary in this case for the trouble it'd
cause), so see:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-revert.html
Assuming the effective reverse patch applies cleanly, it should go easily.
That said, I've never tried the revert command, as I've never been a
maintainer of a public project, so I could get away with rebase w/o
consequence. But it should work.
Thanks,
Michael
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|