libftdi Archives

Subject: Re: Should ftdi_read_data_submit_to() be a new call?

From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Uwe Bonnes <bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:53:25 +0200
On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 14:06:33 Michael Plante wrote:
> Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 04:40:33 Michael Plante wrote:
> >> > Dunno what to say about libftdi-1.0, but my concern was with
> >> > libftdi-0.1/git, which still doesn't seem to have 3b92d47 reverted.
> >> 
> >> As far as I can see from the archive, the discussion was still going
> >> on?
> 
> I thought Uwe had agreed, but we can wait and see what advice he has.

Uwe, any comment on this one?

Cheers,
Thomas

--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   

Current Thread