>> In the case of libftdi, it is possible to stay with libusb-win32
>> 0.1 and yet support async mode since libusb-win32 0.1
>> already supports async mode (not well documented though).
Is the only point of moving libftdi to libusb 1.0 simply to gain solid async
support without dirty tricks? If so, then Jie's option 1 or option 2 seems
best, since win32 would not necessarily lack any of the new libftdi
functionality. Gerd wrote on Aug 5th:
>> The async-mode of libftdi is an evil hack which I wrote when libusb-1.0
wasn't
>> available yet.
Michael
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
