Hi Thomas,
All is fine. Just noticed a minor problem in the comments. Return code
-12 was not mentioned in "ftdi_usb_open_desc_index" as well as the new
"ftdi_usb_open_bus_port".
Maxwell.
--- Begin PATCH ---
From 66ae37ad943976401a54d3ff409634d332206d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxwell Dreytser <admin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:48:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Minor comment fix.
---
src/ftdi.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ftdi.c b/src/ftdi.c
index c26ab72..ac8f18a 100644
--- a/src/ftdi.c
+++ b/src/ftdi.c
@@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ int ftdi_usb_open_desc(struct ftdi_context *ftdi,
int vendor, int product,
\retval -9: get serial number failed
\retval -10: unable to close device
\retval -11: ftdi context invalid
+ \retval -12: libusb_get_device_list() failed
*/
int ftdi_usb_open_desc_index(struct ftdi_context *ftdi, int vendor,
int product,
const char* description, const char*
serial, unsigned int index)
@@ -842,6 +843,7 @@ int ftdi_usb_open_desc_index(struct ftdi_context
*ftdi, int vendor, int product,
\retval -9: get serial number failed
\retval -10: unable to close device
\retval -11: ftdi context invalid
+ \retval -12: libusb_get_device_list() failed
*/
int ftdi_usb_open_bus_port(struct ftdi_context *ftdi, uint8_t bus,
uint8_t port)
{
--
2.9.3
--- End Patch ---
On 04/21/2017 12:04 PM, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
Hi Maxwell,
On Monday, 10 April 2017 04:43:24 CEST Maxwell Dreytser wrote:
Nice to know that this is actually useful! I had a similar situation in
my work.
patch has been applied, thanks!
The long code lines were mangled by our mail client,
I had to apply the patch manually.
Please double check everything is still correct in git.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
