On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Looks about right. However, I am not so sure if EPERM is now a valid
> >> return error number in libusb-1.0.
>
> Xiaofan> I think it is not a valid error return number in libusb-1.0.
>
> The last patch doesn't use the libusb return, but the errno() set by the
> system.
I see. In that case, I think your patch is ok.
--
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
