>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Thomas> Uwe, On Thursday, 20. May 2010 00:39:32 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> >>>>> "Xiaofan" == Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> The
>> last patch doesn't use the libusb return, but the errno() set >> by
>> the system.
>>
Xiaofan> I see. In that case, I think your patch is ok.
>> Who does apply the patch in libftdi-1.0 ? You or Thomas?
Thomas> The last and most current version was from "18.05.2010 16:08"
Thomas> and is for libftdi-1.x only, right?
Yes, the patch from "18.05.2010 16:08" is the right one, applicable only on
libftdi-1.0.
The patch implements the same logic as libftdi-0. With libusb-1.0 there
is no more need for the ifdef, as libusb_detach_kernel_driver() is available
on all platforms, also as a nop() on some.
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
