On Tuesday, 25. May 2010 17:34:18 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Thomas> Uwe, On Thursday, 20. May 2010 00:39:32 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> >> >>>>> "Xiaofan" == Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>
> >> >>>>> The
> >>
> >> last patch doesn't use the libusb return, but the errno() set >>
> >> by the system.
>
> Xiaofan> I see. In that case, I think your patch is ok.
>
> >> Who does apply the patch in libftdi-1.0 ? You or Thomas?
>
> Thomas> The last and most current version was from "18.05.2010 16:08"
> Thomas> and is for libftdi-1.x only, right?
>
> Yes, the patch from "18.05.2010 16:08" is the right one, applicable only
> on libftdi-1.0.
>
> The patch implements the same logic as libftdi-0. With libusb-1.0 there
> is no more need for the ifdef, as libusb_detach_kernel_driver() is
> available on all platforms, also as a nop() on some.
Thanks Uwe, applied.
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
