On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Thomas Jarosch
<thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday, 25. January 2013 20:50:17 Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> > Hopefully this is the final release candidate and we can
>> > push out libftdi 1.0 next week for good.
>>
>> There are some problems with Sleep definition in the examples.
>>
>> Here is the build log with MinGW.org's MinGW/MSys.
>>
>> It would be good to be able to manually specify the libconfuse
>> include and lib just like libusb-1.0. It seems to use pkg-config
>> where native MinGW does not provide.
>>
>> I am also not build Boost bindings and Unit test example here
>> due to the lack of Boost in my current MinGW.org toolchain.
>
> This affects the Windows build only. So IMHO this is not a show stopper for
> the 1.0 final. Let's get it out of the door and fix minor stuff like this
> later
> on. Otherwise we end up polishing it until 2015 ;)
The examples build used to be okay though, not so
sure it is because of the change in MinGW or because of the
change in ftdi.h and examples (now no libusb-1.0.h include
which might take care of the Win32 situation).
Ref: http://developer.intra2net.com/mailarchive/html/libftdi/2012/msg00099.html
But I agree with you this is very minor. But if some
Windows expert can come out a quick fix to the
sleep problem, then it would not hurt to work.
--
Xiaofan
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
