libftdi Archives

Subject: Re: [1/5]new-baudrate-code/origin: The BM_type_chip option no longer exists

From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:43:42 +0200
Hi Uwe,

On Thursday, 8. September 2011 10:11:00 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> The following set of patches is done against new-baudrate-code. Either
> apply them to new-baudrate-code and then move the whole tree to roigin
> when you feel comfordable with it, or apply to 1.0 too

I've put them in "master" as I want to keep the baudrate changes separate.

Regarding the baudrate branch, should we just "fix" up the result
for the AM type chips and merge it or do you want to tweak it some more
if someone comes up with a real working AM type chip?

Thomas

--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   

Current Thread