libftdi Archives

Subject: libftdi-1.0 versus libftdi

From: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:58:01 +0800
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-June/thread.html#15740

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Martin Zenzes
<mzenzes at informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote:
>> Just want to make it clear. Are you saying that libftdi-1.0
>> solved the following problem you have with FT2232?
>>
>> > Error: couldn't read enough bytes from FT2232 device (0 < 81)
>> > Error: couldn't read from FT2232
>> > Error: couldn't read enough bytes from FT2232 device (79 < 81)
>> > Error: couldn't read from FT2232
>>
> Yes...

This thread might be interesting. I do not know the reason
why libftdi-1.0 solves the OP's problem there.


-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com

--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   

Current Thread
  • libftdi-1.0 versus libftdi, Xiaofan Chen <=