Hi James,
James Snyder wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone is using the python bindings yet?
The python bindings are pretty new, so I guess you were the first
one to try them besides the original author.
> I've attempted to play around with them and found that at least with the
> SWIG I've got I had to rearrange a few things to get them to compile
> properly. There are also some macros provided by cstring.i that make
> using at least the read function a lot more python-like.
Which version of SWIG are you using?
Feel free to send a patch for the cstring.i stuff, though I can't really
review it myself as I hardly speak python. Maybe I can bug Tarek to join
the list as our current email policy discards posts from non-members.
> Also, It seems like many of these functions are ripe to become methods
> for a class that deals with the context struct. I'm not sure of the
> best way to do this since I'm not a SWIG expert.
I didn't even know about SWIG before the patch was sent :-)
Cheers,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
