On 11/05/2014 10:28 PM, Forest Crossman wrote:
>
>>> - ((vendor == 0 && product == 0) &&
>>> + (!(vendor || product) &&
>>> (desc.idVendor == 0x403) && (desc.idProduct == 0x6001 ||
>
>> I currently don't see the reason why this part of the code was changed?
>
> Oh, I really only changed that to stay consistent with the other change--it's
> functionally equivalent.
alright, I've applied the patch as is. Thanks!
Cheers,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|