On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Thomas Jarosch
<thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> thanks for you patches.
>
> I've applied patch 1. and 2. after checking
> libusb's LICENSE file for compatiblity.
> (-> same license as libftdi)
>
> Regarding patch 3/3, I let Xiafon decide it's fate. His previous build
> instructions had a few more details about libusb vs. libusbx.
I think it is okay to accept patch 3/3.
>From OpenOCD mailing list discussions, it seems using
pkg-config is the proper way to go.
On the other hand, I think it is actually not that easy to build
all parts of libftdi1 using cross compile. At least I have
not successfully tried that route -- the Boost bindings
and the Python bindings may not be that easy. I usually
build libftdi Windows binaries natively under Windows,
using MinGW/MSys, build libconfuse and Boost from
source, and use CMake-GUI to get everything built.
--
Xiaofan
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
