libftdi Archives

Subject: Re: Re: Some patches

From: Uwe Bonnes <bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:27:16 +0200
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Thomas> Hi Uwe, On Wednesday, 26. September 2012 14:36:44 Jim Paris
    Thomas> wrote:
    >> Uwe Bonnes wrote: > here two patches pending from my tree.  > The
    >> first one adds some definitions around the FT2xx family,
    >> 
    >> Both 2XX and 2XXX can be confusing, since it's distinct from 232 and
    >> 2232, Maybe using FTDI's family name X-Chip or FT-X is better
    >> (e.g. TYPE_FTX, TYPE_X, TYPE_XCHIP, TYPE_XSERIES)?

    Thomas> any comment on this one?

Sorry for staying in No-Como mode.

The names proposed by Jim sound more sensible. I am fighting on other things
now, so no patch for that, as I it is will be incomplent and non-tested.

Bye
-- 
Uwe Bonnes                bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   

Current Thread