In article <20110908190717.GB31476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I wrote:
>Second, many of the examples use EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE, yet
>they don't #include <stdlib.h> where these constants are located,
>according to the C standard. The patch below fixes that.
May I ping on that again? It's easy enough to fix.
Is there any kind of formal bug tracker system where I could file that
kind of requests? In my experience, patches sent to a mailinglist
always have a tendency to get lost over time, because developers are
currently busy with something else, and by the time they'd have some
free resource to handle it, they eventually forgot about that
mailinglist posting from a couple of months ago.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
