libftdi Archives
|
From: | Newell Jensen <Newell.Jensen@xxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
To: | libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:47:10 -0800 |
Thomas, Thanks for the reply. �So I researched it some more, both with Python and C programs which give the same response. �I have posted my Python script here�http://pastebin.com/k7PuLsQq�and for the C program I just used the libftdispi at�http://code.google.com/p/libftdispi/�and I have several things that I would like to point out:
1. If I only try to claim INTERFACE_A, then I get usb_bulk_write fails (no new message shown with dmesg) and program execution does not complete.
2. If I try to claim other interfaces besides INTERFACE_A, usb_bulk_write works and the program completes execution but I get a message in dmesg that says this: [ 1129.201072] usb 2-6: usbfs: process 13739 (spitest) did not claim interface 1 before use
3. If I try to claim interfaces A-D (I have the FT4232), then the same thing happens as in 2 above where I get program to complete execution and a new message in dmesg is shown. �This leads me to believe that INTERFACE_A is claimed here?
So here is my question ...�Does the dmesg message as talked about in 2 above a concern? �Or is this normal behavior? I haven't gotten far enough yet to test whether I do actually have control over all the interfaces and that is my next step but if you see anything of concern, let me know.
Thanks! On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hello Newell, libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. |
Current Thread |
---|
|