>>>>> "DJ" == DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Usage pattern is like * (open device) *
>> ftdi_eeprom_initdefaults(ftdi, "My_MANU","MY_DESC","MY_Serial") with
>> libftdi setting values according to ftdi->type * change
>> ftdi->eeprom->xx items according to local needs * ftdi_erase_eeprom()
DJ> This is wrong for the FT232R. For that, you always read the
DJ> existing eeprom data first, *then* make changes. Never start with a
DJ> blank eeprom or you'll lose the unique serial number that FTDI puts
DJ> in each FT232R, which is stored *after* the regular eeprom data!
DJ> This number is separate from the MY_Serial in your email, although
DJ> FTDI puts a unique one of those in also, which your use pattern
DJ> would lose.
I forgot to mention:
On FT2232R, the USB control message
libusb_control_transfer(ftdi->usb_dev, FTDI_DEVICE_OUT_REQTYPE,
SIO_ERASE_EEPROM_REQUEST, 0, 0, NULL, 0, ftdi->usb_write_timeout) < 0)
doesn't do anything and the new code returns even before
sending the control message. Only data below 0x80 is considered writable at
all under checksum protection.
Daring now to give my code a try?
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
