Good morning Uwe,
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 10:29:32 CET Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to bring up an old report from 19 Aug 2010.
>
> The issue seems not to be resolved yet:
> >>>>> "Fewell," == Fewell, Edward <efewell@xxxxxx> writes:
> Fewell,> Per Gordon Lunn of FTDI: "With the FTxxxxH devices a latency of
> Fewell,> 0ms actually works and allows for fastest performance."
>
> Fewell,> I confirmed with a modified libftdi driver that this does work
> Fewell,> with a FT2232H chip, and can improve throughput.
>
> Fewell,> Edward Fewell
>
> This will help with small transactions.
we could add a special case for the FT2232H chips,
that would be easy to do.
When I see code like this in the library
if (ftdi->type == TYPE_2232H || ftdi->type == TYPE_4232H || ftdi->type ==
TYPE_232H)
packet_size = 512;
I'm wondering if the other hi-speed xxxH devices also support this?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|