Hi Ali,
On Monday, 25 September 2017 12:35:45 CEST Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
> Thank you for the quick reply, Thomas.
>
> Does this mean libftdi 1.x should not have this problem?
>
> Also, would you please let me know if the sync fifo mode of 232h has been
> tested and if there is a working example?
I think the timeout code was never forward-ported to libftdi 1.x
and so far nobody complained :)
Back in the days I was a bit hesitant about the code change
since it will change the behavior for existing applications.
Regarding the sync FIFO mode, either someone else on
the list has an idea or I would look around the git history
who contributed the code and ask this person. It will probably work.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
