>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Thomas> On Saturday, 2. October 2010 17:32:15 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> to ease API/ABI stability with future extensions, appended patch
>> provides ftdi_get|set_eeprom_value and ftdi_get_eeprom_buf to get a
>> copy of the
ftdi-> eeprom->buf content.
>> Is this the way to go with access to struct ftdi members too?
Thomas> Reviewed, spell checked and applied :)
Thomas> Now we can decide if we want prohibit direct access to the
Thomas> private parts (by moving the ftdi_eeprom struct to a separate
Thomas> header file).
Thomas> Though this will make the transition from libftdi 0.x to 1.x
Thomas> harder than renaming just some eeprom variables. Opinions?
My vote to prohibit direct access to the eeprom and also to struct
ftdi_context
--
Uwe Bonnes bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|