On Friday, 24. September 2010 11:34:03 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Thomas> I still have trouble reading the code because of the "k"
> bitmask Thomas> wraparound magic. Maybe we find a better name for it,
> like Thomas> "eeprom_size_limit"?
>
> It is used as a mask, either 0x7f on 46 type chips or 0xff for 56/66 type
> chips, what about "eeprom_size_mask".
Ehr, yes, that's what I had in mind. Let's stick to eeprom_size_mask.
I'll do the modification.
> But I agree, sensible names are the A and O of good documentation, but
> are hard to get by..
Exactly :)
Thomas
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
