libftdi Archives

Subject: Re: Any reason to call usb_set_configuration()

From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: libftdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "Richard A. Smith" <richard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Uwe Bonnes <bon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:40:40 +0200
Hello Richard,

On Thursday, 23. July 2009 21:53:51 Richard A. Smith wrote:
> Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> >>>>>> "Xiaofan" == Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >     Xiaofan> Just wondering why not detach both interfaces? Or better
> > give Xiaofan> the user an option to detach the interfaces he wants to
> > detach Xiaofan> (so that he can use the other interface as UART).
> >
> > The other interface may still be in use for serial transmission...
>
> This is the exact configuration I want to use for the new OLPC
> serial/programmer using a 4232H.  Port B as a SPI programmer and then
> Port C as a serial interface.

Do you intend to use Port C via the kernel ftdi_sio driver
or will it also be controlled by libftdi (as serial interface)?

I intend to include Uwe's "#ifdef __WIN32__" patch,
so please let me known any objections soon.

Thomas


--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   

Current Thread